Settings

Language

PixVerse V6 API Pricing: $0.022 to $0.115 per Second (2026 Data)

CryptoCrypto
·July 7, 2026·10 min read·Updated July 11, 2026·127 views
#video#ai-api#tokenlab#pricing
PixVerse V6 API Pricing: $0.022 to $0.115 per Second (2026 Data)

Questions this answers

  • How much does PixVerse V6 API pricing cost through an API?
  • When should developers use PixVerse V6 API pricing instead of a direct provider account?
  • How does TokenLab help compare PixVerse V6 API pricing with related models?

PixVerse V6 API pricing is per-second and scales with resolution and audio. Through fal.ai's hosted endpoint, rates run from $0.025/s at 360p (no audio) up to $0.115/s at 1080p with audio. Through PixVerse's own platform, the Starter pack works out to about $0.04/s for a 720p, 5-second, no-audio clip ($1 for 5 videos). Through TokenLab's model directory, pixverse-v6 currently carries a flat lock price of $0.022/s, the cheapest of the three PixVerse tiers listed there. This guide shows the full rate breakdown, sample cost math, and how PixVerse V6 stacks up against Veo 3.1, Seedance, Hailuo, and Kling on a per-second basis.

Key Takeaways

  • fal.ai's PixVerse V6 endpoint bills per second: $0.025-$0.035/s at 360p, $0.035-$0.045/s at 540p, $0.045-$0.060/s at 720p, and $0.090-$0.115/s at 1080p, with the higher number in each pair for audio-on generations (source: fal.ai PixVerse V6 page, observed 2026-07-07).
  • PixVerse's own docs quote $1 = 5 videos for V6 at 720p, 5s, no audio (Starter pack), which works out to $0.20 per clip or about $0.04/s (source: PixVerse Platform Docs, observed 2026-07-07).
  • TokenLab's model directory lists pixverse-v6 at a flat $0.022/s lock price, cheaper per second than the older pixverse-c1 ($0.026/s) and pixverse-v5.6 ($0.031/s) listings on the same directory.
  • Sound effects add 2 credits/s and upscaling adds 5 credits/s on top of base PixVerse V6 generation credits (source: PixVerse Platform Docs).
  • Normalized per second, PixVerse V6 at 720p (fal, no audio) is cheaper than Veo 3.1 Standard ($0.40/s) and roughly comparable to Veo 3.1 Fast ($0.10/s), but the comparison flips depending on resolution and audio settings, so always match tiers before comparing.

Source Snapshot

Source What it provides Observed
PixVerse Platform Docs Official credit rates per second by resolution/audio, Starter pack promo rate 2026-07-07
fal.ai PixVerse V6 page Per-second USD pricing by resolution and audio mode 2026-07-07
TokenLab model directory Platform lock price for pixverse-v6, pixverse-c1, pixverse-v5.6 2026-07-07
Google Gemini API pricing Veo 3.1 per-second USD by tier (Standard/Fast/Lite) 2026-07-07
MiniMax API video pricing Hailuo 2.3 per-request point pricing 2026-07-07
Runway API pricing Per-second credit rates covering Seedance 2, Veo, gen4.5 hosted via Runway 2026-07-07
Kling AI Developer Platform Unit-based pricing, unit-to-model ratio needs direct verification 2026-07-07

PixVerse V6 Rate Table by Resolution and Audio

This is the actual per-second breakdown, not a generic description of how tiered pricing works.

Resolution Audio fal.ai price/s Official credits/s
360p No $0.025 5
360p Yes $0.035 7
540p No $0.035 7
540p Yes $0.045 9
720p No $0.045 9
720p Yes $0.060 12
1080p No $0.090 18
1080p Yes $0.115 23

Extras on top of base credits: sound effects add 2 credits/s, and upscaling adds 5 credits/s (source: PixVerse Platform Docs, observed 2026-07-07).

TokenLab Directory Pricing for PixVerse Models

Model Category Pricing unit Lock price
pixverse-v6 video per_second $0.022059/s
pixverse-c1 video per_second $0.026471/s
pixverse-v5.6 video per_second $0.030882/s

TokenLab lists a single flat per-second rate for pixverse-v6 rather than separate resolution or audio tiers. That flat rate does not necessarily mean 1080p-with-audio traffic is billed the same as 360p-no-audio traffic once you go through the actual API call, so confirm the current tier structure on the TokenLab model page for pixverse-v6 before budgeting a resolution-heavy workload against this flat number.

Sample Cost Calculations

Use these worked examples to sanity-check your own volume estimates. All figures are per clip, not monthly totals.

5-second clip, 720p, no audio:

  • fal.ai: 5 x $0.045 = $0.225
  • PixVerse Starter pack promo: $0.20 flat (per the $1 = 5 videos rate)
  • TokenLab flat rate: 5 x $0.022059 = $0.11

10-second clip, 1080p, with audio:

  • fal.ai: 10 x $0.115 = $1.15
  • TokenLab flat rate: 10 x $0.022059 = $0.22 (again, verify whether TokenLab applies a resolution or audio surcharge before relying on this for a 1080p-heavy budget)

100 clips/month, 720p, no audio, 5s each (fal.ai pricing):

  • 100 x $0.225 = $22.50/month before any retries or upscaling

These numbers move fast if you add upscale (5 credits/s) or sound effects (2 credits/s) on the official credit schedule, so run the same math against your actual production settings, not the cheapest advertised tier.

PixVerse V6 vs Other Video Generation APIs (Per-Second Normalized)

Model Price signal Source
PixVerse V6, 720p, no audio $0.045/s fal.ai
PixVerse V6, 1080p, with audio $0.115/s fal.ai
PixVerse V6 (TokenLab lock price) $0.022/s TokenLab directory
Veo 3.1 Standard, with audio $0.40/s (720p/1080p), $0.60/s (4k) Google Gemini API pricing
Veo 3.1 Fast, with audio $0.10/s (720p), $0.12/s (1080p) Google Gemini API pricing
Veo 3.1 (TokenLab lock price) $0.10/s TokenLab directory
Veo 3.1 Fast (TokenLab lock price) $0.04/s TokenLab directory
Seedance 2 via Runway, 720p $0.36/s (36 credits/s x $0.01) Runway API pricing
Seedance 2 Fast via Runway, 720p $0.29/s (29 credits/s x $0.01) Runway API pricing
gen4.5 via Runway $0.12/s (12 credits/s x $0.01) Runway API pricing
Hailuo 2.3 Fast $0.19/request (point-based, not per-second) MiniMax API pricing
Hailuo 2.3 Pro $0.49/request (point-based, not per-second) MiniMax API pricing
Kling approx $0.14/unit, exact per-model ratio unverified Kling AI Developer Platform

Two caveats worth acting on. First, MiniMax bills Hailuo by video points per generation (0.7 to 2 points depending on model, resolution, and duration), which does not convert cleanly to a per-second rate, so treat the $/request figures above as directional. Second, Kling's developer pricing page describes unit-based billing at roughly $0.14/unit in a recent snapshot, but the exact units-per-model conversion needs to be confirmed on the provider page before you commit budget, since unit pricing pages change without a version history you can audit after the fact.

On provider lifecycle: Google has confirmed Veo 3.0 models are deprecated with a shutdown scheduled for June 30, 2026, and recommends migrating to Veo 3.1 Preview or GA Agent Platform models (source: Google Gemini API pricing docs, observed 2026-07-07). If you're comparing PixVerse V6 against Veo for a new integration, build against Veo 3.1, not Veo 3.0, to avoid a forced migration shortly after launch.

For a broader breakdown of how video model APIs stack up on capability and pricing beyond this single comparison, see TokenLab's best AI video models API 2026 roundup.

If your product also touches image generation (thumbnails, storyboards, or reference frames before generating video), the best AI image models API 2026 comparison covers current image pricing, including FLUX.2 tiers from $0.014/image up to $0.07/image, which some teams pair with a video model like PixVerse V6 for final output.

Checklist: What to Verify Before Committing to PixVerse V6

  • Confirm the current rate for your actual target resolution and audio setting, not the cheapest advertised tier shown above
  • Decide whether you're routing through PixVerse directly, fal.ai, or TokenLab, since the per-second rate differs meaningfully across all three (roughly $0.022-$0.115/s depending on path and settings)
  • Test generation latency under realistic load, not a single sample request
  • Confirm rate limits and concurrent request caps for your expected traffic
  • Check whether failed or low-quality generations are billed the same as successful ones
  • Confirm whether upscale (5 credits/s) or sound effects (2 credits/s) apply to your workflow, since these compound quickly at volume
  • Compare against at least one alternative video model (Veo 3.1, Seedance, Hailuo) on the same benchmark prompts before locking in

This is the same due diligence process TokenLab recommends across model categories in its general pricing comparison guide, since budgeting off a headline number that doesn't match your actual usage pattern is a common failure mode across text, image, and video APIs alike.

Where to Check Current PixVerse V6 Rates

Video model pricing shifts often. Don't rely on cached screenshots or old blog posts for exact numbers going forward.

  • Check the TokenLab model directory at tokenlab.sh/en/models, which lists current pricing and specs across multiple providers in one place (source: TokenLab model directory, observed 2026-07-07).
  • Cross-reference with PixVerse's own docs and fal.ai's model page for the most authoritative, real-time per-second figures.

If you're already comparing multiple model providers through an aggregator or router, TokenLab's OpenRouter comparison covers how routing layers affect both pricing and reliability when you're not calling a provider directly.

Compare video models to see how PixVerse V6 pricing lines up against Veo 3.1, Seedance, Hailuo, and Kling, filtered by resolution, duration support, and cost.

Budgeting for a PixVerse V6 Integration

If you're building a product feature around PixVerse V6 (short-form video generation, marketing asset automation, or a creative tool), budget in three stages:

  1. Prototype phase: test at your target resolution and audio setting, not the cheapest tier, to get an accurate per-clip baseline (use the sample calculations above as a starting template).
  2. Load testing phase: run your expected production volume against the API to measure real cost per unit, including regenerations for failed or low-quality outputs, which the per-second rate table above does not account for.
  3. Production phase: set up usage alerts or spend caps, since a jump from 720p-no-audio to 1080p-with-audio more than doubles the per-second rate on fal.ai ($0.045/s to $0.115/s).

Teams building AI coding tools alongside video features should also check TokenLab's best AI models for coding 2026 guide, which covers current coding-model pricing like Claude Sonnet 5 ($2/MTok input, $10/MTok output through August 31, 2026) and DeepSeek V4 Flash ($0.14/MTok cache-miss input, $0.28/MTok output), since mixing model categories often means juggling multiple pricing structures in one budget.

Get Started by comparing PixVerse V6 against Veo 3.1, Seedance, and Hailuo on TokenLab's directory before finalizing which provider fits your resolution, duration, and budget requirements.

FAQ

How much does PixVerse V6 API pricing cost through an API? Through fal.ai's hosted endpoint, PixVerse V6 runs $0.025-$0.035/s at 360p, $0.035-$0.045/s at 540p, $0.045-$0.060/s at 720p, and $0.090-$0.115/s at 1080p, with the higher figure in each pair covering audio-on generations. PixVerse's own Starter pack promo works out to about $0.04/s for a 720p, 5-second, no-audio clip ($1 for 5 videos). TokenLab's model directory lists a flat $0.022/s lock price for pixverse-v6. A 5-second 720p no-audio clip costs $0.225 via fal.ai, $0.20 via the PixVerse Starter pack, or about $0.11 via TokenLab's flat rate.

When should developers use PixVerse V6 API pricing instead of a direct provider account? Use TokenLab or an aggregator when you want a single per-second rate ($0.022/s currently listed) and one integration surface across multiple video models instead of managing separate accounts, credit systems, and rate limits with PixVerse and fal.ai directly. Use a direct provider account when you need resolution-specific billing control, want to confirm exact credit consumption for upscale and sound-effects add-ons, or need SLAs that only the direct provider offers.

How does TokenLab help compare PixVerse V6 API pricing with related models? TokenLab's model directory lists pixverse-v6, pixverse-c1, and pixverse-v5.6 side by side with per-second lock prices, plus other video models like Veo 3.1 ($0.10/s), Veo 3.1 Fast ($0.04/s), and Seedance variants, so you can compare normalized per-second costs in one place instead of cross-referencing five separate provider pricing pages. The video model category page filters by resolution, duration support, and cost.

Sources

Price observed 2026-07-07

Share:

Related models

Recent public models

Build with the models in this guide

Compare pricing, test routes, and move from article research to a working API call.