AI Model Rankings

Compare demand, complete text pricing, task fit, and major image and video model families.

Popular models

50

Models with strong current interest

Low-cost text

50

Text models with complete input and output prices

By task

17

Candidates grouped by workload

Multimedia

12

Major image and video model families

Popular models

Models with the strongest current demand and practical availability.

RankModelProviderDemandCategory
1gpt-5.4OpenAI904.3KChat / vision
2GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI339.2KChat / vision
3GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI333.5KChat / vision
4deepseek-v3-2DeepSeek164.5KChat
5gpt-5.4-miniOpenAI126.9KChat / vision
6gpt-5.5OpenAI101.7KChat / vision
7gemini-3.1-flash-liteGoogle100.3KChat / vision
8GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI99.8KChat / vision
9gpt-4o-miniOpenAI63.1KChat / vision
10claude-opus-5Anthropic41.9KChat / vision
11claude-opus-4-8Anthropic30.9KChat / vision
12gemini-3.1-pro-previewGoogle23.4KChat / vision
13deepseek-v4-proDeepSeek22.0KChat
14gpt-image-2OpenAI15.6KImage
15text-embedding-3-smallOpenAI11.8KEmbedding
16claude-sonnet-5Anthropic8.9KChat / vision
17gemini-3.5-flashGoogle8.1KChat / vision
18DeepSeekDeepSeek4.8KChat
19GLMZhipu AI3.6KChat
20claude-haiku-4-5Anthropic2.4KChat / vision
21gpt-4.1-miniOpenAI2.2KChat / vision
22gpt-4oOpenAI2.0KChat / vision
23claude-sonnet-4-6Anthropic1.5KChat / vision
24claude-fable-5Anthropic1.4KChat / vision
25seedance-2.0ByteDance1.2KVideo
26nano-banana-2Google414Image
27grok-imagine-videoxAI363Video
28grok-4.5xAI305Chat / vision
29gemini-3.1-flash-imageGoogle300Image / vision
30claude-opus-4-6Anthropic238Chat / vision
31whisper-1OpenAI218Audio / Speech to Text
32seedance-2.0-fastByteDance210Video
33gemini-3.6-flashGoogle135Chat / vision
34gemini-3.5-flash-liteGoogle126Chat / vision
35doubao-seed-1.6-flashByteDance106Chat
36gpt-5.2OpenAI91Chat / vision
37Qwen-EmbeddingAlibaba Cloud82Embedding
38glm-5.3Zhipu AI78Chat / Code
39gpt-5OpenAI78Chat / vision
40grok-4.20xAI75Chat / vision
41claude-opus-4-7Anthropic71Chat / vision
42hy3Tencent68Chat
43nano-banana-proGoogle68Image
44flux-2-klein-4bBlack Forest Labs66Image
45gemini-3-pro-imageGoogle65Image / vision
46gpt-5-miniOpenAI63Chat / vision
47qwen3.7-maxAlibaba Cloud61Chat
48minimax-m3MiniMax54Chat
49qwen-flashAlibaba Cloud53Chat
50gemini-3.1-flash-lite-imageGoogle49Image / vision

Compare models by demand, price, task, and media family

Popular text models, low-cost text options, task candidates, and multimedia families need separate comparison criteria.

Selection signals

  • Demand highlights models that developers are already testing.
  • The low-cost table only includes comparable text models with complete token prices.
  • Multimedia models are grouped by family because output units, latency, and workflow shape differ.

FAQ

Are these rankings a benchmark?

No. They combine TokenLab model data with usage, category, and pricing information. Public benchmarks should still be checked at the original source.

How should I choose a model?

Compare price unit, context length, latency needs, request format, reliability, and the workload you expect to run.