Choose Auto, TokenLab Verified, or Official for each request, with prices shown up front.See what's new

Back to models

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-5.6 Luna: current price, context, max output, and supported operations.

Which one to choose

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for coding agents that must look at a rendered interface, then reason and act, and for long code and document sets paired with images. Pick GPT-5.6 Luna for steady high-volume work that needs structured JSON and quick, light responses. Luna is the smallest GPT-5.6 tier and OpenAI lists that family as legacy; V4.1 Flash is DeepSeek's current Flash model.

Pricing comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-5.6 Luna
Model makerDeepSeekOpenAI
Delivery availabilityAvailableAvailable
Context window1M1.05M
Max output384K128K
Official price
Input$0.15per 1M tokensOutput$0.60per 1M tokens
Input$0.20per 1M tokensOutput$1.20per 1M tokens
TokenLab price—
Input$0.06per 1M tokensOutput$0.36per 1M tokens
Model performance
30-day success rate
95.4%
7-day median latency
5.9 sn=472
30-day success rate
87.7%
7-day median latency
9.1 sn=343
Capabilities
JSON modePrompt CacheTool useVisionReasoning
CodeJSON modePrompt CacheReasoningTool useVision

Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash when

  • Your agent inspects a rendered page or screenshot, interprets it and continues a multistep task.
  • You feed large code and document sets next to images and reuse instructions with prompt caching.
  • You want the current model that DeepSeek updates on its Flash line.

Choose GPT-5.6 Luna when

  • Your pipeline needs schema-checked JSON from every call.
  • Traffic is steady and high-volume, and responses must be quick rather than deeply reasoned.
  • You want reasoning to be adjustable so that simple turns skip extended thinking.

How they differ

AspectDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-5.6 Luna
Core pitchFirst Flash release with native visual understanding, combined with reasoning and tool calls.Smallest and most cost-efficient GPT-5.6 model, for fast high-volume work.
Structured outputResponse-schema support is not listed, so JSON-heavy pipelines should validate output themselves.Structured JSON output is supported.
ReasoningReasons in thinking mode and can return reasoning text separately.Reasoning is adjustable, so simple turns can skip extended thinking.
Escalation pathdeepseek-v4-pro remains the DeepSeek choice for the hardest reasoning and coding.Sol and Terra handle long agent runs and difficult coding better.
LifecycleThe September 2026 update that replaced earlier V4 Flash variants.Part of GPT-5.6, which OpenAI lists as legacy in favor of GPT-6.

Summary

  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Input $0.15 / Output $0.60 per 1M tokens; GPT-5.6 Luna: Input $0.06 / Output $0.36 per 1M tokens. Rates depend on the billing unit, specification, and usage. Compare matching conditions in the model's detailed pricing; a single rate does not determine the total cost.
  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash supports 3.0x more output tokens
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
DeepSeek V4
View details
GPT-5.6 Luna
GPT 5.6
View details

FAQ

Which is better for screenshot-driven agents?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is described for exactly this: it combines vision, reasoning and tool calls so an agent can inspect an interface and continue. Luna also reads images, but its pitch is speed and volume rather than visual agent work.

Which one guarantees structured JSON?

Luna returns structured JSON. V4.1 Flash has no response-schema support listed, so validate its output in your own code if your pipeline depends on exact fields.

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash a replacement for V4 Flash?

Yes for DeepSeek's line: it is the September 2026 update, the first Flash with native vision, and earlier V4 Flash variants have been retired in its favor.

What if tasks keep failing on the smaller model?

Move up within the same maker. For DeepSeek, use deepseek-v4-pro. For OpenAI, use GPT-5.6 Terra or Sol, or look at GPT-6 models, which OpenAI recommends for new projects.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GPT-5.6 Luna?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Input $0.15 / Output $0.60 per 1M tokens; GPT-5.6 Luna: Input $0.06 / Output $0.36 per 1M tokens. Rates depend on the billing unit, specification, and usage. Compare matching conditions in the model's detailed pricing; a single rate does not determine the total cost.

What are the key differences between DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-5.6 Luna?

GPT-5.6 Luna: Code

Sources

Reviewed Oct 2, 2026